I just posted an article about a US Department of Justice investigation into unnecessary stenting.
When young interventional cardiologists sit in hospital cafeterias commenting that they need to find ways to increase the number of procedures they do (i.e. increase revenue) I get a little nervous. They should be looking for ways to PREVENT the need the for a stent! Prevention should be the first concern as stents cause problems of their own.
The COURAGE study proved that optimum non-surgical therapy is as effective as surgical therapy for patients who are not suffereing acute symptoms.
By all means get a stent or whatever intervention you doctor advises in an emergency! But, in non-emergent situations you may wish to seek additional prefessional guidance.
What were the circumstances surrounding your stent? Your insight and experience could help another member of our community!
Next Discussion: aortic valve replacement »